Liz: SugarB,
Let’s curtail this P.C (Politically Correct) where necessary. As it is, it’s usually the most offensive that are most defensive and before you know it the real victims- subdued more through uppity than P.C are at the mercy of Twalyangannamwe not to mention having their precious history rewritten by some pretentious Nilotic transvestite.
If it’s a tribal war then let whoever bring it on! Some people read silence as approval if not consent.
Hi Liz,
I'm new to this forum, have read this thread thoughtfully, and have taken particularly umbrage to your submission quoted here above. Smart of you to talk of PC issues in regard to the writing of history, it being so unprecise. Personally, I think being PC is actually politically incorrect. But, in relation to history, I must digress.
As u probably, know, every nation 'makes' the kind of History (history with a concious capital H) that it considers beneficial to its future national interest. To me, this is the crux of the matter. Is Uganda's 'national' history to be written from a nilotic or a bantu perspective? The issue is crucial not only for Uganda but for Africa as a whole, because the dividing line between Bantu and Nilotic Africa crosses through Uganda.
We are all victims of bad History. Uganda's history, for instance, is so Ganda-centric that the grand histories of the Karamojong, the Acholi, the Langi, the Madi and the Lugbara are lost in the midst of the so-called grand history of the kingdom states, ie. Buganda, Bunyoro, Ankole and Toro.
If u bother to read the histories of these nilotic societies objectively, or, to borrow ur own use of the term PC, in a PC manner, then u will discover that these Nilotic socities were actually more egalitarian (and egalitarianism is the best attribute of modernity) than the tyrannies that existed in the Bantu areas of the Great Lakes Region.
U will then learn that those who are most defensive are not really those who r most offensive. U will learn, sadly the hard way, that those who are most offensive are those who bother to do their research and discover that the precedent for state killing within the boundaries of modern Uganda, for instance, was laid by the Kings of Buganda, and that modern history books mention the Katikiro etc but conveniently ignore the 'Mukajanga' - the official executioner!
U will also learn, the hard way, that the precedent to what many consider Nilotic 'barbarity' - that is Joseph Kony's lip, nose and ear slitting to wit - was first manifested by a hero of Buganda - Kakungulu - in Lango.
So, please, let's do what the Americans did in Texas, for instance. They turned all the many 'wanted' murderers, bank robbers and thieves who had taken refuge in the old mission at Alamo into heros by making them defend the land against the Mexicans
So there, be reasonable! Tribal war? U have already lost. Our silence is victory over ill-considered voices like yours!
I'll defend, to the death if need be, your just and moral right to hold an opinion different from my own.