Comments

# Humphrey Mutaasa said on Sunday, October 12, 2008 11:19 AM

YES!

These two tribes are related and no one is against it. However the coming up of the other 6 clans is what disturbs. As if that disturbs alittle, them claiming to become kyabazinga makes the whole throne a political seat which totally a wrong phenomenon.

This is a mornachy and this as brought about when other than kyabazinga he was called president, remember who that one was, thats where the problem roots from.

Otherwise we are related like the noterners and the kenyan westerners are related as Luos. so we are rooting from the Mukama grand father and Naudo. thats it. So the 5 sons should be the right heirs of the throne.

I thank You

Humphrey.

# kalulu robert said on Monday, October 20, 2008 3:44 PM

Its true basoga are related to banyoro arcoding to the way they speak, like the balamogi from kaliro district they talk the same way as banyoro.  busoga being a kingdom, the kyabazinga should come from the muloki family not any where else

Leave a Comment

Title (required) 

Name (required) 

Your URL (optional)

Comments (required) 

Remember Me?